header
Home News & Analysis Events Resources Media Action Alert About VIC Support VIC Links Search
Carnaval Del Pueblo and El Sueño Existe
Thursday, 26 July 2007
Dear Friend,

Please find below details of two forthcoming events - Carnival Del Pueblo and El Sueño Existe. Both of these events are great fun as well as a good chance to spread the word about the advances in democracy and social progress taking place in Venezuela. Venezuela will have a high profile at both events, with Cesar Aponte from Venezuela’s Ministry of the Environment speaking at the latter.

The Venezuela Information Centre (VIC) is looking for volunteers at both these events to help on VIC stalls and distribute literature. If you can help, please reply to this e-mail or call the office on 0207 250 0132.

Best wishes and we look forward to seeing you at these events,

Venezuela Information Centre.


Carnaval Del Pueblo

The Largest Latin American Event in Europe, August 5

Float Procession with the participation of 11 Latin American countries from City Hall (SE1) to Burgess Park via London Bridge and Elephant & Castle, 12pm – 3pm.

Carnival in the Park If you want to join the party at the park, where attractions start at 10 am, you should go to Burgess Park, in Camberwell, Chumleigh Street, London, SE5. Artists performing include the world renowned LOS HERMANOS ROSARIO.

For more information, details of acts/attractions and directions: click here or 0207 6861633


El Sueño Existe – The dream lives on


New Statesman intensifies its attacks against the Chavez government
Friday, 20 July 2007

Colin Burgon MP writes in the New Statesman (19 July 2007).  "Last week's New Statesman cover story by Alice O'Keeffe, 'Chavez: From Hero to Tyrant' (New Statesman 12 July 2007  click here(1)  claiming  that Hugo Chavez had polarised Venezuela was a distorted snapshot, devoid of present or historical context. The inference that prior to Chavez, Venezuela was a largely stable generally united society is risible".
New Statesman, anti-Chavez editorial line
New Statesman, anti-Chavez editorial line


Impartial journalism?
Impartial journalism?

Publishing such a  politically charged and alarmist article on its front page  -- written by its arts editor Alice O'Keeffe --  would indicate that the New Statesman under the leadership of John Kampfner has clearly adopted a robustly anti-Chavez editorial line. We very much hope that they will moderate this editorial line following the wave of protest at Ms. O'Keeffe's exceptionally unbalanced and distorted article. This brand of journalism  is more akin to the pieces we would expect to find in the Evening Standard or the Daily Mail rather than in the New Statesman. The N.S. used to have some claim to represent progressive forces in Britain anNew Statesman intensifies its attacks against the Chavez governmentd has hitherto had a reasonably good track record of  accurate and good quality reporting and analysis on Latin America. However, readers might be justified in thinking that the N. S., at least on Venezuela, seems to be aligned with the Venezuelan opposition and shares the views of the U.S. State Department.
 
Colin Burgon's full letter:

Chávez: the defence
Colin Burgon MP, Labour Friends for Venezuela
Colin Burgon MP, Labour Friends for Venezuela

Colin Burgon

Published 19 July 2007

Colin Burgon MP - chair of the Labour Friends of Venezuela - responds to last week's New Statesman story on the controversial South American leader

Last week's cover story by Alice O'Keeffe, claiming Hugo Chávez had polarised Venezuela, was a distorted snapshot, devoid of present or historical context. The inference that prior to Chávez, Venezuela was a largely stable generally united society is risible. Venezuela is a nation in flux and one of great importance to the UK. On this premise, O'Keeffe's imbalance must be challenged.

She presented a country in "cold civil war" mode, one that is led by a "power-crazed" Chávez could easily turn "hot". Labelling Chávez as such implies a denial of democratic expression by the Venezuelan population.

In fact, Chávez has won three elections - all free, fair and overseen by international observers - doubling his vote between the first election in 1998 and his last one in December 2006. There is a "Chavista" majority in the National Assembly because the opposition boycotted the 2005 congressional elections following strategic advice from Washington; so the result was a foregone conclusion.

The writer then highlighted the increase in the number of Venezuelans fleeing the country for the US and the serious levels of violent crime across Venezuela. On the former point, O'Keeffe makes no reference to the fact that this state of affairs is being encouraged by the US through forthcoming changes to immigration law that will allow Venezuelans privileged entry into the country over people from conflict-prone states such as Haiti, Somalia and Iraq.

On the latter point, Venezuela clearly has a problem with crime, but it is not new. In the past 15 years it has been a serious, structural issue that has escalated and owes much to the illicit flow of weapons and drugs from neighbouring Colombia - a nation that receives US and UK military aid, despite an appalling human rights record.

O'Keeffe depicts Chávez as polarising any on the "third side". But the Bush administration has been fully complicit in the elimination of any neutral voices, financing the main opposition parties and, via its National Endowment for Democracy, openly and secretly funding civil society, so undermining organisations that should be respected as neutral actors.

When predominantly private university students demonstrate over RCTV, no mention whatsoever is made of pro-government rallies from public-sector students. There are also strong indications that the anti-government student rebellion is being externally orchestrated. When students were offered the opportunity to speak in the National Assembly by the Venezuelan government, an event televised nationally, they left behind their notes; it transpired they had been provided by a well-known PR agency.

It is this Manichean description of a nation polarised and propelled by a demagogue into possible civil war - rather than one finally and democratically challenging social injustice - that underpins O'Keeffe's assessment. This view becomes transparent if one considers the pre-Chávez social climate, where examples of social turmoil that very nearly did bring civil war are evident.

In 1989, President Andrés Pérez implemented free-market reforms under instruction from the IMF. This included the privatisation of state companies and carte blanche to multinationals to sew up Venezuelan resources. Social inequality soared, fuel prices rose by 100 per cent and public transport costs by 30 per cent.

Ordinary Venezuelans - largely the poor - took to the streets in their thousands. Ensuing riots resulted in the deaths of up to 3,000 civilians, mostly at the hands of the security forces. The government declared a state of emergency and placed Caracas under martial law. The repression in the teeming barrios was so savage the events are referred to as the Caracazo massacres.

Recent demonstrations against Chávez have been policed without repression or brutality. Venezuela is a more stable nation now than probably ever before. Facts and context again diminish news value.

In O'Keeffe's analysis, the catalyst for unrest remains the revocation of RCTV's licence by the official regulatory body. The station had repeatedly violated broadcast laws yet now transmits via cable. This was patently not an attack on free speech.

In the days before the 2002 coup, RCTV constantly focused on a general strike aimed at ousting Chávez. Commentators relentlessly attacked him and the government was refused response. Advertising breaks encouraging Venezuelans to attend an anti-Chávez demonstration dominated air time, as did blanket coverage of the actual event. As was recorded and exposed, when the demonstration ended in violence and death, RCTV manipulated video footage to turn the blame on Chávez supporters.

A coup was mounted and Chávez abducted - events covered by O'Keeffe in a perfunctory single sentence. At this point, the station played a crucial role in ensuring an information blackout, preventing Venezuelans from being made aware that Chávez had been kidnapped and had not "resigned" as was claimed.

Even so, hundreds of thousands of Chávez supporters demanded his return in protests that RCTV declined to cover. The then news director, Andrés Izarra, explained to National Assembly hearings that he received an order to broadcast: "Zero pro-Chávez, nothing related to Chávez or his supporters . . . The idea was to create a climate of transition and to start to promote the dawn of a new country."

RCTV chief Marcel Granier and other media magnates then attended the Miraflores Palace to support the new dictator, Pedro Carmona, who had dissolved the elected Supreme Court, National Assembly and Constitution.

Do O'Keeffe and others seriously suggest that such actions by a broadcaster would be tolerated were a similar military coup launched in London, Madrid or Washington? Of course not, and it is for this reason, above all, that they have no credibility.

Where lobbying, sanctions, direct interference, armed coup attempts and threats have failed, the pro-US, invariably corporate sponsored, anti-Chávez network hopes that international criticism on human rights and freedom may succeed in establishing the climate for civil unrest and the replacement of a democratically elected government. If it does, O'Keeffe et al may well be invited for cocktails in Caracas.

Colin Burgon MP is chair of Labour Friends of Venezuela

Letters in New Statesman website in response to Alice O'Keeffe's article.

19 July 2007
Chávez, fallen hero: your responses

Alice O'Keeffe's article ("Chávez: from hero to tyrant", 16 July) turns reality on its head to such an extent that it is breathtaking. Can someone be a tyrant when they have won a huge majority in free and fair elections just eight months ago? Yes, Venezuela has been polarised - between the overwhelming majority who, before Hugo Chávez, had nothing from society, and a wealthy elite. Thankfully that is now changing.
Surely, investing in education, health and social infrastructure will help overcome division and dislocation. That is what Chávez is doing, and it is why he is so popular among the majority.
The RCTV television channel is not banned. It simply didn't have its licence renewed. It can still broadcast, alongside all the other private, right-wing, anti-Chávez channels that make up the bulk of stations in Venezuela. Governments around the world, including our own, decide not to renew licences all the time. Are they all tyrants? And the private media are not the epitome of democracy: they are mainly controlled by people rich enough to be able to buy a TV station or newspaper, and they put out whatever propaganda they want. At least more people can read the papers now, because Chávez's government eliminated illiteracy.
Jayne Fisher
London EC1

Gemma Tumelty
President, National Union of Students
London NW1

Richard Gott
London W11

Joe Gill
Brighton

That the government allowed RCTV to continue broadcasting on free-to-air television for five years after aiding the violent overthrow of Chávez in 2002 shows just how much freedom of expression there is in Venezuela. It is also still available on cable (see http://oilwars.blogspot.com/2007/07/damn-that-was-quick.html).
John M Drewery
Huddersfield, West Yorkshire


Notes

Chávez myths
Martin Bright's critique of the London-Venezuela oil deal ("Ken's friends", 5 March) is seen by many on the Labour benches as a one-dimensional, almost Cohenesque anti-Livingstone diatribe.
Could Bright not have contacted any Latin American academics to balance his piece? The objections are led by such esteemed observers as a "former colleague from his GLC days", "the Conservatives" and Teodoro Petkoff. Petkoff's assertion that Hugo Chávez's policies have increased poverty have been repeatedly exposed as erroneous, notably on the discovery by the Washington-based think-tank CEPR that publications such as the FT and Foreign Affairs published outdated data to skew the economic picture in Venezuela.
Further, Chávez is depicted as authoritarian, presumably owing to the closure of a private television station. If a UK TV station assisted in organising a military coup against our government, fomented violence and manipulated images to forward that coup, would Nigel Fountain be calling for it to have its licence renewed?
Colin Burgon MP
Jon Trickett MP
Jon Cruddas MP
London SW1


VENEZUELA INFORMATION CENTRE CELEBRATES FIRST AGM
Wednesday, 18 July 2007
VENEZUELA INFORMATION CENTRE CELEBRATES FIRST AGM
 
VIC’s first AGM was held on Saturday 30 June at Congress House, hosted by SERTUC. The packed meeting was attended by more than 100 delegates, representing  the range of organisations and individuals who constitute VIC, including trade unions, local groups, special interest groups and community organisations from all over Britain. A constitution was agreed and five officers and 25 Executive Committee members were elected.
Lively exchanges at VIC's AGM
Lively exchanges at VIC's AGM

In a session chaired by TUC President and UNISON representative Alison Shepherd, the AGM passed  motions highlighting the need to continue to build the broadest possible campaign in solidarity with Venezuela, to strengthen support for the advances in social progress and democracy in Venezuela, to support Venezuela’s right to determine its own affairs free from foreign intervention, to lobby to ensure that the British government and the European Union develop constructive policies towards Venezuela and to reject the hostile position of the US government towards Venezuela.

The AGM also noted that the London-Venezuela mutual co-operation agreement will benefit up to 250,000 Londoners with half-price transport and provide much needed expertise on planning, the environment, transport and other areas to Venezuela. It resolved to prioritise raising awareness and building support for the London-Venezuela co-operation agreement.

Other motions covered the need to step up VIC’s important work to challenge the media lies about Venezuela and to strengthen its Media Action Network, and further develop Lesbian and Gay Friends of Venezuela, Teachers for Venezuela and Students for Venezuela; to foster links between women’s groups in Britain and Venezuela.

The AGM was followed by a panel discussion chaired by Tony Burke, Assistant General Secretary of Unite the Union, with Rod Stoneman, Executive Producer of the inspiring documentary “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised” and Dr Julia Buxton.

Reporting on his recent trip to Venezuela, Rod spoke of his visits to the new TV channel -- TEVES -- which last month was granted the broadcasting licence previously held by RCTV. He was impressed at the quality of TEVES programming as well as that of community-focused stations such as Vive and Avila. He added that community radio and television stations have mushroomed throughout the country in the past couple of years and enjoy large support among the population.
Rod Stoneman discussing the media and Venezuela
Rod Stoneman discussing the media and Venezuela

Dr. Julia Buxton, expert in Venezuelan affairs, emphasised the intensification of the media war against Venezuela and warned that we should be prepared for an increased onslaught. The US was stepping up ‘Voice of America’ broadcasts into Venezuela and considerably bolstered funding through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was being channelled to Venezuelan  “human rights” groups. There had been attempts to smear President Chavez with accusations of non-compliance with anti-drug initiatives - despite evidence to the contrary endorsed by the UN Office on Drug Control (UNODC) who had recently given a very positive report on Venezuela and even the British government had stressed support to Venezuela’s anti narcotic operations through a reply to a parliamentary question of Colin Burgon MP.  There had also been attempts in coverage of President Chavez’s current trip to Russia to portray him as a war monger seeking to build up Venezuelan military capacity, despite the fact that Venezuela now spends US$200million per annum less on arms than it did in the 1980s.

Julia added that the reason for the US efforts was clear.  Chavez’s global vision sought to promote a different version of international co-operation and to strengthen South-South links and initiatives. Examples of this were the recently created Bank of the South (Banco del Sur) to finance aid projects  in the developing  world and funding  for projects in Africa along the lines of Venezuela’s successful social programmes/missions (Venezuela has recently opened 13 embassies in Africa).  These initiatives provided realistic alternatives to the IMF and World Bank and thus undermined the self-interest of the US.
Dr Julia Buxton: latest developments in Venezuela
Dr Julia Buxton: latest developments in Venezuela

Julia highlighted the critical importance of the post-election formation of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) which  has the enormous potential to gave more influence to grass-roots movements. She spoke about the “five motors of the revolution” which included directing US$6 billion of funding  to support 17,000 community councils thus empowering the barrios and small rural communities.

VIC Secretary Gordon Hutchison closed the AGM saying that the day had left delegates inspired and renewed in their commitment to continue building an effective, broad-based campaign in solidarity with Venezuela.  He said that it was possible to win the argument with large sectors of the British public concerning developments in Venezuela  and this had to be a top priority for the coming year. He asked that everyone become directly engaged in VIC’s work and that they return to their localities and branches with the message that we had to engage with all sectors of society and tell them about the inspiring example of Venezuela which gave real hope of the possibility of building a better world.   
 
<< Start < Prev 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Next > End >>

Results 249 - 256 of 300
Comment & Analysis Media action alert News from Venezuela Support for Venezuela VIC News
Latest news
Telling the truth about Venezuela
An international campaign of misinformation, led by the Bush administration, is seeking to undermine support for the democratic government of Hugo Chávez.

In this section VIC exposes the false claims made in the media.
More rebuttals here, and send your examples of inaccurate coverage to info@vicuk.org

Challenging the media distortions – Join the Media Action Network

The VIC Media Action Network challenges media inaccuracies by alerting you to negative press stories and giving you the facts to help you respond though letters to newspaper editors and with comments on websites. Sign up.
Sign up for VIC updates
Click here to receive email updates.
All articles are the opinion of the author and not necessarily of VIC.